A number of medical organizations oppose the CDC’s new recommendations, because the guidance is not backed with research or evidence. They say that the CDC released the guidelines without following established procedures for making vaccine schedule changes.“[In the past, proposed changes, through the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices], have gone through extensive review, making sure that all the data being presented meets the high-quality data standards.”
said
Marci Drees, M.D., ChristianaCare’s Chief Infection Prevention Officer, who served as a liaison to ACIP in recent years. “The level of evidence that was presented was nowhere near what normally is presented…. All of that has gone out the window.”The updated guidance may cause some parents to wonder if they should vaccinate their children with shots that have been given routinely to protect children from preventable illness.“One of the dangers is that… people may interpret this as, ‘It’s optional,’” said
Stephen Eppes, M.D., a pediatric infectious disease physician at ChristianaCare. “It’s been shown that using… a targeted vaccination approach [results in] much lower rates than if something is universally recommended.”Although the CDC’s stance on certain vaccines has changed, the guidelines from professional medical associations have not.“It’s really important that patients who are concerned about any change to talk about it with us,” said
Jessica Fields, M.D., a maternal-fetal medicine physician at ChristianaCare. “Our clinical bodies have not changed recommendations, we’re still using that same body of evidence.”